The good news: 5G is on. The less good news: Roll-out in Europe is slow. The reality: Europe remains entangled in geopolitics instead of accelerating 5G deployment.

Romania needs a top-notch 5G infrastructure. Security must be a priority, but without mixing up protection measures with geopolitical matters. This makes digital policies incoherent. Against this background, the proposed ICT law lacks proper reflection and consultation.

The draft law has an immense impact on the Romanian economy. Just 7 days for the Chamber of Deputy to decide is way too short and should be at least extended to 30 days.

In addition, such a law needs to be notified to the European Commission, which apparently has not been done. This omission puts in doubt its legitimacy. 

The text shows significant gaps in how to implement the propositions. Here are a few considerations:

5G is not a monolithic block. It comprises sub-networks, i.e. access, transport, and core, and many components provided by multiple vendors and integrated and managed by operators. The core network is the most sensitive part as it stores and processes data, user identification, gateways, billing, and cryptographic keys. In particular, the generation, storage and protection of these keys should be a focus point, which is hardly mentioned in the debate at EU level.

It is a misrepresentation to assume that the 5G network alone would result in industrial transformation. When 5G is switched on, nothing will happen for the industry besides better communication.  Industrial applications need significant investments in edge computing and intelligent software. Does Romania want to establish an all-encompassing authorization scheme? 

Occasionally one hears the argument that the 5G radio access network (RAN) cannot be separated from the industrial applications and might constitute a risk not present in 4G.  However, based on 3GPP specifications 5G RAN can be perfectly detached from the edge network and the core functions hosted within. The biggest challenge is not in separating the RAN but to secure the applications running on 5G networks. This is the task that deserves much more attention. 

It is unclear how to implement the provision of the role of foreign governments. When European countries make divergent decisions it will emerge as protectionist measures, probably incompatible with WTO rules.

Regulation can cause significant costs, delay 5G roll-out, and may not even be effective. My advice is not to make hasty decisions. Therefore, the Chamber of Deputy should organize a public debate to discuss the provisions in a transparent manner.

Author: Dr. Detlef Eckert, Deep Digital Consulting, Belgium.

This is native content supported by Deep Digital Consulting.